Structured Collaboration on Supremacy of Thought

At ConceptPaper.org we believe in the concept that there should be a structured collaboration on supremacy of thought. After the advent of the internet and after the world becoming a global village it is now possible for humankind to collaborate and establish which thought process is better. It is now possible to collaborate, discuss and establish which way of life is better.

There is disagreement on very basic things. Such as:

1. What are humans composed of ?

2. What is human nature, what is natural to humans and what is unnatural to humans.

3. What is Good, What is bad ?

4. Which intention is good and what should humans and organisations be intending ?

5. What is an optimal human like ?

It’s very interesting that even after connecting billions of people there is no unity on what we are. It’s almost funny that humans don’t agree on what they are even composed of.

Humans are made of the body, a mind, the self, a heart, a soul, a spirit. Unfortunately there is no concensus within all humanity on these components.  We disagree even on what we are. That is why we put forward the earlier concept of:

Global Concensus on What are Humans Composed of [ Click to Read ]

Similarly there is no concensus on what is natural to humans and what is unnatural to humans. On what is human nature. It’s amazing that with billions of people connected there is no agreement on what is natural to us and what is unnatural for us. That is why at ConceptPaper.org we put forward the concept of:

A Global Concensus on Human Nature [ Click to read ]

Similarly there is no concensus within humanity on what is a good human like. This is also strange. Billions of people are connected but they don’t agree on what is a good human and what are the traits of a good human. There is no agreement on what is an optimal human like and what is a suboptimal human like. That is why at ConceptPaper.org we put forward the concept of:

Global Agreement on What is The Optimal Human

Similarly there is no agreement on what is good and what is bad. It’s amazing that billions of people are connected but they can’t reach on some sort of basic agreement on what is good what is bad. At ConceptPaper.org we propose the concept of:

A global discussion on what is good and what is evil.

Similarly there is no proper open collaboration on Intentions. There is alot of mistrust between nations and one nation does something while the other thinks their intention is bad. We feel world peace and unity is only possible if the intentions in the hearts are openly discussed. Mistrust can only be removed if intent is discussed openly. That is why at ConceptPaper.org we propose the concept of:

A Global Intentions Monitoring Body

So that intentions could be discussed, established, agreed and disagreed upon.

We feel therefore humanity needs a structured collaboration on establishing supremacy of thought. We first need to  discuss what are humans composed of. We need to discuss what is human nature, what is natural to humans and what is unnatural to humans. We need to discuss and agree on what is an optimal human like. We need to discuss intentions. Thereafter we need to have discussion on who is right on what humans are composed of. Who is right on what is human nature. Who is right on what is natural, unnatural for humans. Whose definition of the optimal human is correct. Who’s intentions are good. Whoever is correct on all of these then their supremacy of thought should be established. For this, at ConceptPaper.org we propose a Structured Collaboration on Supremacy of Thought.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s